<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the mystery of querying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/</link>
	<description>You have to visit this geeky girl&#039;s blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cine</title>
		<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regretless.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oooh, okay, I see. I didn&#039;t know that, thanks! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, okay, I see. I didn&#8217;t know that, thanks! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dianna</title>
		<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dianna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regretless.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interesting!  i would have used the first... thanks for the tip!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting!  i would have used the first&#8230; thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dodo</title>
		<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dodo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regretless.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; If you are selecting only a few rows with LIMIT, MySQL uses indexes in some cases when normally it would prefer to do a full table scan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/limit-optimization.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;form here&lt;/a&gt;

it&#039;s not about the result, it&#039;s about optimizing and speed. you are welcome to do a test compare two queries with limit and without using that debug class. on average, with limit is always faster. again because reason above. so it&#039;s always a good idea to use LIMIT 1 even if you don&#039;t need it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> If you are selecting only a few rows with LIMIT, MySQL uses indexes in some cases when normally it would prefer to do a full table scan.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/limit-optimization.html" rel="nofollow">form here</a></p>
<p>it&#8217;s not about the result, it&#8217;s about optimizing and speed. you are welcome to do a test compare two queries with limit and without using that debug class. on average, with limit is always faster. again because reason above. so it&#8217;s always a good idea to use LIMIT 1 even if you don&#8217;t need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cine</title>
		<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regretless.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oi, complicated. Joining tables are just too far out of my league so far. But out of curiosity - why the LIMIT 1? If the uids are unique -which they should be- is it really necessary?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oi, complicated. Joining tables are just too far out of my league so far. But out of curiosity &#8211; why the LIMIT 1? If the uids are unique -which they should be- is it really necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semi Sweet</title>
		<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semi Sweet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regretless.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Complicated. Makes me want to take at least an intro computer science class. :biggrin:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complicated. Makes me want to take at least an intro computer science class. :biggrin:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daynah</title>
		<link>http://pure-essence.net/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daynah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 05:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regretless.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-mystery-of-querying/#comment-17212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting.  I wonder why that is.  Maybe there&#039;s less joining of tables on the second query?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  I wonder why that is.  Maybe there&#8217;s less joining of tables on the second query?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

