Comments on: CSS 3-column layout http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/ You have to visit this geeky girl's blog. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:26:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ben http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17962 Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:42:00 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17962 I agree wholeheartedly. Personally, I won’t hesitate to use tables if it’s going to save me time and if the user wouldn’t notice the difference anyways. Otherwise, I stick to CSS as much as I can. :cool:

]]> By: Krystal http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17961 Wed, 20 May 2009 19:25:46 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17961 Tables are soo much eaiser when trying to structure things, but CSS is like the “better” method according to professional developers. I find it hard to create more than two columns using CSS and takes so much of my time which could be done in about 5 mins using tables.

Maybe sometime in the future CSS will develop to include structures or an effectiveness positioning system.

]]> By: Jenny http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17960 Tue, 19 May 2009 17:36:49 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17960 I’ve always found 3 cols to be kinda…annoying. But I can put them together pretty quick. It’s getting them to work in everything that’s the pain.

]]> By: Bubs http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17959 Fri, 15 May 2009 17:27:25 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17959 I can make a non-fluid layout using CSS almost as fast as using tables. However, I do miss the days of tables and width=”100%” height=”100%” :P

]]> By: Margaret http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17958 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:37:02 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17958 I thought there are now CSS table structure???

Did I misunderstand??

]]> By: Alberto http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17957 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:27:32 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17957 I strongly agree with you. Normally you can modify or re-write an entire theme ten times faster with the so deprecated tables then with css. There is really something wrong with the standards and the way they work.

]]> By: Edie http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17956 Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:41:44 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17956 I love this layout it is very cute!

]]> By: Nadiah Alwi http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17955 Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:19:10 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17955 Hi, I found your blog because it seems like I am using a template that you designed. Just wanna say: thank you so much! Cheers! :smile:

]]> By: Lissy http://pure-essence.net/2009/04/08/css-3-col-layout/#comment-17954 Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:56:55 +0000 http://regretless.com/?p=1422#comment-17954 I like having the flexability to change my layout to however I want and not have to worry about going in and modifying the html. OK, so sometimes that’s not that easy either, but at least it’s possible. With tables, you can’t have users choose between multiple, drastically different layouts. A grid thing would be sweeeeeet!

I can’t go to the link b/c att is telling me they have dirty art. At least that’s what I’m guessing “EXART” means anyway.

]]>